game-n-ponation-plant-sebema-dem-tube-to-pant-1

“Reducing game”: feel stupid. You will like it.

There are almost no plot spoilers here, but if the directorial moves are equal to the spoiler for you, they are available here.
If you can immediately define swap, outfit and OCD and name the reason for the collapse of the global economy in 2008, then perhaps this blogging blog will not resonate with your sensations from the film by Adam Macakey “Reducing Game”. However, you can use it as a guide to the world Simple mortals.

I can’t do anything from the above. My economy teacher will hardly be happy, accidentally stumbled upon such words on my part, but I spent the first third of the film on the study of exchange terminology from scratch. And then the picture itself comes to the rescue.

A substantial loan. Ah, excuse me, you don’t know what it is? Well, then hold the top model, which, sipping champagne and not neglecting the word “shit”, will explain it simply and understand. Only distribute attention between ears and eyes at least 60 to 40 in favor of the ears. The picture has to make it differently, but you can, I believe.

And this is done more than once. The film breaks the fourth wall, spits from a high bell tower on those who consider the inscriptions on the screen and the narrative with the help of an offset voice with a complete failure and simply does everything possible to be interesting with maximum authenticity of an adversarial excavator.

On this, with the most popular www.abukingcasino.co.uk topic of conversations about this film, you should finish and talk a little about the fact that you are unlikely to find in the tweets of the neighbor-housewife Aunt Klava, who accidentally got to this film due to the fact that the places on the “best day” ended and “Well, the movie trout still arrived, let’s look at these Oscar nominees”.

Frankly-I saw a trailer before I found out something in detail about the film. After this trailer, I did not want to look radically at This. By the will of fate, I forgot what the trailer was and hit the “game”. And, leaving the hall, I had to spend a lot of effort to convince myself that the trailer was really to this movie.

Entering the hall, you expect a crossover “Wolf with Wall Street” and “Ocean friends”. At least, everything goes to this and something such a viewer, at first, receives. The first third (or even half) film, consists of a vigorous routine Wall Street with jokes-pribauts, disclosure of characters and the development of history. The narrative is built luxurious, picture (unlike a number of other Oscar films) lures and goes very cheerfully.

At the moment when you ask yourself: “This is definitely a nominant film?”, He, most likely, will begin to move to that very state of Oscar melancholy and philosophy. The symptoms will look out gradually, and the disease leak without special suffering for the patient and sympathetic, but it will be noticeable.

Those very acute and smart questions begin to appear in the second half, gradually facing and replacing the entire circus of the beginning. The transition is made very smart, it does not cut your eyes and looks appropriate. You can not even notice how this whole holiday of life and the benefit of words shit Suddenly became a smart film. Smart not terms, but thoughts and message.

The end is worthy, however, alas, in the very style that many Bayopics of recent years suffer. Giving tribute-this ending, nevertheless, is much more reasonable than attempts to park Maybach in an aluminum “shell” performed by other biographical paintings.

Acting … but nothing to talk about, in fact. Everyone played at the highest level. For myself, I noted Pitt, who appears here in a very non -standard image. Personally, I haven’t seen him like that yet. But all the others, of course, deserve the highest praise. About the same can be said about directing and technical performance. Beyond praise.

As a result, there is a very strong film that you want to review (not only to google incomprehensible words). Subjectively, I will appreciate it at 8.5 points out of 10. And I will cordially advise you to see it. At least for the sake of the rare satisfaction from your own stupidity that this film can give.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *